Age is not just a number when it comes to clinical trials
October 22, 2024 | Age, Diversity, Inclusion, Representation, Trial Design, clinical trials
In this blog we look at the critical underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials, emphasising the need for inclusive trial designs and targeted strategies to ensure safe and effective medicines for this population.
Age is just a number. You’re as young as you feel.
Right? Well, when it comes to clinical trials, not quite.
Older people (those aged 65 and above) use the largest share of medicines, but are severely underrepresented in clinical trials across most treatment areas.1 This is especially true for the over-75s, who account for as few as 1% of trial participants.2
This has some big implications. It means medicines are coming into use that may not have been fully tested with, by, or for their intended audience.
As an example, less than half of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s drug approvals include safety and efficacy data from older people.2 This data can’t just be generalised from younger trial participants.1 When it is, HCPs have difficulties prescribing,3 and older people may experience unexpected, serious side effects.1
It’s clear then that greater representation of older people in clinical trials is not just a nice to have, it’s crucial to ensure safe, effective medicines in the real world. Older people do want to take part in clinical trials, and generally have positive experiences when they do.4 But, despite action from the European Commission, FDA1 and UK MHRA5, the problem of low representation still exists.
Why is this?
Eligibility criteria are essential to ensure the safety and accuracy of clinical trials. But many trials feature poorly justified, restrictive criteria, based on arbitrary upper age limits6, comorbidities7, and polypharmacy6, among others, which exclude many older people from taking part. And those who do take part are often fitter, healthier, and less representative of the general population.8
But this is just one part of the equation. Older people who meet all of a trial’s eligibility criteria still face other barriers that younger participants might not. Things like:
- Poorer understanding of the informed consent process1
- Increased risk and burden of side effects1
- Issues with trial site access, and the number and length of visits1
- Simply losing interest if they’re not being appropriately engaged7
So, how can the industry address this?
Through fresh perspectives on how trials are designed and communicated.
If older people are the intended population for a new medicine, involving them, and their loved ones, in trial planning from the start can help to set priorities, remove logistical barriers, and ensure eligibility criteria are fully justified.8
Alternative trial designs may offer effective new ways to involve older people. For example, some adaptive trials have completely removed age restrictions5, and trials featuring expanded-eligibility cohorts may allow the inclusion of more people with comorbidities9. Where appropriate, decentralised trials could also allow treatment, testing, and monitoring from the comfort of home5.
Whatever the design, human interactions are a cornerstone of any successful clinical trial. To engage with older people in clinical trials, they need a network of engaged people around them:
– Familiar faces among site staff, with the skills, time and resources to adapt to their needs1
– Family, friends, and caregivers who understand the trial and can advocate for them8
– A broader community they feel part of, to provide motivation and moral support1
Every part of this network needs targeted strategies, from accessible participant information sheets that help overcome cognitive and sensory barriers, to bespoke support materials for caregivers, to communication training for site staff.
If we can do this right, it’ll mean new medicines, developed with older people, for older people.
References
- Buttgereit, T., ‘Barriers and potential solutions of older patients in clinical trials’, Oxford Academic, Age and Ageing, Vol. 50, Issue 6. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Van Marum, J., ‘Underrepresentation of the elderly in clinical trials’, British Pharmacological Society, Vol. 86, Issue 10. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Schwartz, B., ‘Representative enrolment of older adults in clinical trials’, The Lancet, Healthy Longevity, Vol. 4, Issue 7. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Parks, M., ‘Current Challenges Faced by Cancer Clinical Trials’, Springer Link, Oncology and Therapy, Vol. 9, pages 55 – 67. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Walker, E., ‘The status of drug evaluation in older adults in the United Kingdom’, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Cruz-Jentoft, J., ‘Upper age limits in studies submitted to a research ethics committee’, National Library of Medicine. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Forsat, D., ‘Recruitment and Retention of Older People in Clinical Research’, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Pitkala, H., ‘Clinical trials in older people’, Oxford Academic, Age and Ageing, Vol. 51, Issue 5. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
- Jin, S., ‘Re-Evaluating Eligibility Criteria for Oncology Clinical Trials’, National Library of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology. Accessed August 2024. Available here.
This content was provided by Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Company Details
Latest Content from Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Clinical research in 2026: The trends shaping tomorrow
Discover the key trends shaping clinical research in 2026, from patient-centric approaches to empowering site staff and fostering stronger human connections.
From overwhelming to actionable: Bringing lifestyle guidance to life
Discover how clear communication and health literacy principles can transform complex patient materials into simple, engaging, and empowering health information.
Behind the scenes: why we created ‘The participation equation’
Go behind the scenes of The participation equation – our call to put people, not just data, at the heart of clinical research.
Cuttsy+Cuttsy launches R:SQD – a new way to predict and improve trial success
Cuttsy+Cuttsy has launched R:SQD, an innovative recruitment and retention success scoring tool that helps clinical trial sponsors predict, measure, and improve participant engagement and trial outcomes.
New report, The participation equation, uncovers key drivers of patient engagement in clinical trials
Cuttsy+Cuttsy’s new report, The participation equation, uncovers what drives patient engagement and retention in modern clinical trials through insights from over 700 participants and industry experts.
Why patients drop out of weight management trials and what you can do about it
Discover the key barriers to retention in obesity and weight-management trials and explore actionable, patient-centered strategies to improve engagement, outcomes, and data reliability.
Cuttsy+Cuttsy welcomes new team members
Cuttsy+Cuttsy is excited to announce the addition of three talented professionals to the team: Flo, an enthusiastic Account Executive; Vicki, a creative Graphic Designer; and Jo, a detail-driven Artworker
Designing with patients in mind: How to build more inclusive clinical trials
Discover how patient-centred design transforms inclusive clinical trials. Learn to overcome trial recruitment challenges by listening to patients and creating studies that fit real lives.
Why fresh patient voices are critical to improve clinical trials outcomes
Discover why diverse patient voices, especially first-time participants, are key to improving clinical trials. Boost recruitment, retention, and patient-centric research.
Using patient personas to add a personal touch to clinical trial recruitment and retention
Discover how patient personas can revolutionise clinical trial recruitment and retention. Personalise outreach, build trust, and improve patient engagement.