Pharmafile Logo

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Patient Engagement vs Patient Involvement

Unpack the difference between patient engagement and patient involvement.

Patient talking to healthcare professional

Anna had always been proactive about her health. When she was diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes, she dove headfirst into learning everything she could about the condition and how she could help manage it. She went to her appointments, downloaded apps to help her track her blood sugar levels, and joined an online community of other diabetics to share experiences and tips.

When Anna’s doctor told her about a new clinical trial for a potential new diabetes treatment, she listened to the details and took a pamphlet to read more about it at home. After giving it some thought, Anna decided not to take part. She felt confident that she had everything she needed to manage her diabetes on her own.*

Would you class Anna’s approach to her health as patient engagement or patient involvement? Both are important aspects of patient-centred care, but some key differences define them. Let’s take a closer look.

Patient engagement: a personal journey

Patient engagement refers to the many ways patients can play an active role in their health. It ensures that every patient has the knowledge and tools they need to be confidently involved in their care so that it is suited to their individual experiences, preferences, and needs.1

Examples include:

  • Providing patients with clear and concise information about their health, health conditions, and treatment options
  • Healthcare professionals providing clear guidance, listening to patients’ worries, and answering their questions
  • Involving patients in health-related decisions
  • Encouraging patients to use apps or journals to monitor and keep track of their symptoms or interventions

Patient involvement: creating change through community

Patient involvement is a concept covering the ways people can share their views and experiences to shape the healthcare experience for everyone. The research is carried out with or by them, not to, about, or for them.2 Patient involvement reaches beyond personal health to influence policy, guidelines, and practice.

Some examples include patients:

  • Taking part in a patient advisory board
  • Contributing to the creation of new health research
  • Advocating for changes to health-related policies

Two sides of the same coin

Both patient engagement and patient involvement are concepts that rely on activated patients.3 Both approaches aim to empower patients and promote the importance of their experiences and preferences being considered in decision-making.

Nothing about me without me

As the relationship between doctors and their patients has evolved, concepts like patient engagement and shared decision-making, once buzzwords for the ideals of patient-centred care, have become an important reality and part of everyday practice in healthcare systems around the world.4 But there’s still room for improvement.

Patient advocacy groups are now pushing for more patient involvement. Patient engagement models are encouraging patients to guide their healthcare journey.  Now, there is a call for the collective voice of patients and caregivers to be heard and used to shape the healthcare experience for everyone.5

Changing the story

The possible benefits of encouraging patients to be actively involved in healthcare can’t be underestimated. We already know that when patients are actively involved, it can lead to the greatest benefit of all — better health outcomes.4,6

Patient-centred care cannot exist without patients being involved in conversations about their health, participating in their own healthcare decisions, and shaping the research and policy that informs those decisions.

How can we ever understand patients’ treatment priorities, what information they feel is missing from their materials, and what side effects they find the most difficult to manage if we don’t ask them?

This new perspective can reframe healthcare for everyone involved. It creates an environment where the question is no longer ‘What is the matter?’ but rather, ‘What matters to you?’

Had Anna been asked this question, do you think she would have felt differently about taking part in a clinical trial?

If you’d like to read more about this topic, take a look at our report: Integrating ‘patient-first’ into medicine development

*Anna is a fictional character whose story was created for this blog post.

References

  1. Marzban S, et al. J Patient Exp 2022;16(9):23743735221125439
  2. Patient and public involvement, engagement and participation definitions. Available here. Last accessed: August 2024
  3. Integrating ‘patient first’ into medicine development. Available here. Last accessed: August 2024
  4. Vahdat S, et al. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014;16(1):e12454.
  5. Sacristán, JA., et al. Patient Preference and Adherence 2016;10:631–640 Krist AH, et al. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;240:284–302

This content was provided by Cuttsy + Cuttsy

Company Details

 Latest Content from  Cuttsy + Cuttsy 

Cuttsy+Cuttsy achieves Platinum accreditation from Investors in People

Cuttsy+Cuttsy is proud to have achieved a Platinum accreditation from Investors in People, placing them among the top 2% of organisations assessed globally.

Cuttsy+Cuttsy awarded Gold EcoVadis sustainability rating

Cuttsy+Cuttsy proudly announces their Gold Medal achievement from EcoVadis for 2024, placing them among the top 5% of companies assessed and within the 97th percentile, a testament to their unwavering...

Age is not just a number when it comes to clinical trials

In this blog we look at the critical underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials, emphasising the need for inclusive trial designs and targeted strategies to ensure safe and effective...

How to boost clinical trial access and make patients health-empowered

Clinical research is becoming more patient-centric, but there's still more that needs to be done to make clinical trials available to everyone. This could include wider participation.

Closing the loop: Why clinical trial results matter to participants

Discover why sharing clinical trial results with participants is crucial for respect, informed health decisions, and fostering strong researcher-participant partnerships.

Unveiling the truth: A journey into women’s representation in clinical trials

We explore the historical exclusion of women from clinical trials, its consequences on medical research and treatment efficacy and the ongoing efforts to ensure their representation.

Clarity in clinical trials

Discover how transparent, empathetic communication and health literacy principles can empower patients and enhance engagement in clinical trials, transforming participants into active partners in their healthcare journey.

Caring for patients’ mental health in clinical trials

We look at why ensuring continuous mental health support for patients in clinical trials is essential to enhance their overall well-being and trial engagement.

Driving equitable healthcare: The role of DE&I in clinical trials

Diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I) is becoming a bigger topic of conversation and meaningful action within clinical trials. And for good reason, too. Find out why we embrace this and...

Empowering patients through more accessible clinical trial information

Senior Medical Writer, Scott Palmer explores the challenges and solutions in enhancing patient engagement in clinical trials, from the pivotal role of healthcare professionals, to the importance of user-friendly trial...