Pharmafile Logo

Where it all began – why we developed The Experience Gap

Learn how The Experience Gap was developed to help sponsors, CROs and site teams improve clinical trial participation by identifying friction points, enhancing patient experience, and driving better recruitment and retention outcomes.

Roadmap visual

When we launched The Experience Gap, the response reflected something we hear time and again across the clinical trial community: everyone recognises participation challenges exist, yet turning that understanding into meaningful change remains a real challenge.

There is no shortage of insight. For years, sponsors, sites and patients have been pointing to the same pressures: recruitment is getting harder, retention is fragile, and site burden continues to intensify. Connecting all of these challenges is one defining factor: experience. Because when trial experiences feel fragmented, inconsistent or difficult, participation becomes harder to start – and even harder to sustain.

But insight alone does not drive progress. And that is exactly why we created The Experience Gap.

The foundations for this work began with The Participation Equation – a simple but important shift in perspective. Rather than viewing participation as a single decision point, we saw it as a system shaped by every interaction across the trial journey.

Because participation is influenced by far more than protocol design or recruitment drives. Communication, operational processes, emotional burden, trust and consistency all shape how people experience a trial. Every interaction matters.

That thinking became the lens through which we approached our later research.

Across our first two reports — including The Site Factor — recurring patterns began to emerge. Sponsors were investing heavily in engagement, yet sites were often carrying disproportionate operational and emotional pressure. Patients, meanwhile, were navigating fragmented journeys that rarely felt joined up. Intentions were good, of course, but lived reality frequently looked very different.

Most importantly, these were not isolated findings. The same tensions surfaced repeatedly across conversations, interviews and research. What became clear was that the challenge facing many trial teams was not a lack of awareness, but uncertainty around what to do next.

Teams increasingly recognise that experience matters, but many still struggle to operationalise it. Where should interventions happen? Which moments matter most? How do you prioritise change when resources, timelines and delivery pressures are already stretched?

That gap between understanding and action is what The Experience Gap was designed to address.

From the outset, the aim was to create more than a research report. We wanted to build a practical roadmap that could help teams identify participation friction, prioritise improvements and make more confident decisions across the trial journey.

The roadmap is grounded in lived experience and informed by the realities faced by patients, sites and sponsors alike. It is designed to support practical decision-making, while remaining flexible enough to work across different trial types, phases and operational models.

For us, this is where experience work becomes genuinely valuable – when it informs real-world decisions rather than sitting passively as insight alone.

Closing the experience gap requires more than isolated fixes. Participation is shaped across an interconnected ecosystem of patients, sites and sponsors – which means improving outcomes depends on understanding how experiences connect across the entire trial journey.

That is exactly what The Experience Gap was built to support.

Clinical trials are growing more complex. Competition for both patients and sites continues to intensify, while expectations around support, communication and accessibility are rising fast. Experience is no longer a secondary consideration – it is increasingly becoming a defining factor in whether trials succeed.

But improving experience takes more than isolated initiatives or good intentions alone. It requires clear direction, practical frameworks and the ability to translate insight into meaningful action.

That is ultimately why we created The Experience Gap. Not to add more noise to the conversation, but to help teams navigate it more clearly, and to provide a practical starting point for designing better participation experiences across the clinical trial journey.

Explore The Experience Gap roadmap and discover how insight can be turned into action across every stage of participation.

This content was provided by Cuttsy + Cuttsy

Company Details

 Latest Content from  Cuttsy + Cuttsy 

Serious about sustainability?

Get to know our new Sustainability Officer here at Cuttsy+Cuttsy

Cuttsy+Cuttsy are named as one of the Best Places to Work

Campaign Magazine have released its 2022 ranking for the best places to work and Cuttsy+Cuttsy have come in right at the top at No.3.

Promoting trust: Cuttsy+Cuttsy become a PIF Tick accredited agency

Cuttsy+Cuttsy join a host of noteworthy healthcare charities and institutions as one of the first healthcare communications agencies to receive the Patient Information Forum’s seal of approval – the PIF…

Listening to heads AND hearts in healthcare

We talk a lot about using emotions in healthcare communications, but not as much about the business intelligence(BI) behind it. Find out why it matters and why we are proud…

Does being an independent agency really matter?

With Cuttsy+Cuttsy ranked as #6 in the Independent Agencies listing from PM Live’s T40 Creative Healthcare Agencies 2021, Mathew Cutts reflects on what being ‘independent’ means to him.

Opening up about patient engagement

Read the third blog of the series looking at key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma

Committing time to making meaningful connections – top 5 tips

Read the second blog of the series looking at key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma

Key barriers to effective patient engagement in pharma, and how to fix them: Making engagement processes more patient friendly

In the first of this blog series, Patient Engagement Lead, Philippa Pristerà looks at making engagement processes more patient friendly

Cuttsy+Cuttsy awarded Gold accreditation by Investors in People

Healthcare communications agency, Cuttsy+Cuttsy, has been awarded ‘We invest in People, Gold’ from Investors in People.

Cuttsy+Cuttsy marks its 10th anniversary with the launch of Cuttsy Cares

Healthcare communications agency, Cuttsy+Cuttsy, has announced the launch of Cuttsy Cares, in celebration of its 10th anniversary.  The agency’s charitable programme will deliver up to £10,000 to help improve the quality…