From cloudy to clear: visualising complex data privacy information
April 17, 2026 | clinical trials, communication, health literacy
Discover how clear communication principles can transform complex clinical research topics, as we conclude our Health Literacy series with a practical example on participant data transparency.
For the final instalment of our Health Literacy series, we’re sharing another example of how we apply clear communication principles in practice. Here, we explore how we approached a crucial topic in clinical research: participant data.
Medical data is private – it’s sensitive and not something you want to share with strangers. The lack of transparency around how clinical trial data is stored and used can be a major barrier to participation, particularly for underrepresented communities.
We understand the complexity that comes with this topic. There are so many regulations, nuances, and technicalities to consider, which often means the information reads like a Terms & Conditions page. Although the reader has been “informed”, have they really read it? And more importantly, do they really understand?
Our “before” and “after” example shows how a simple flow diagram can help to translate this critical information so anyone can understand how their personal data may be shared.
Before:
The language is contractual and uses technical terms withoutcontext. It’s difficult to know what data your doctor, a researcher, or thebroader scientific community might be able to see.
After:
We’ve broken this information down into a flow diagram, clearly calling out the steps in place to ensure personal data are not identifiable. We made use of visual cues to emphasise that the data becomes more difficult to identify when it is processed and shared. Finally, using real examples of the types of data that may be collected helps provide the transparency readers are looking for.
Ultimately, we’ve provided a clear, visual commitment, supported with examples, to illustrate exactly how readers can expect their personal data to be used.
Clear communication about participant data isn’t just a regulatory requirement – it’s essential for building trust in clinical research. By presenting complex information in ways that people can easily understand, we can help more participants make informed decisions about taking part in clinical trials.
This content was provided by Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Company Details
Latest Content from Cuttsy + Cuttsy
Why faster trials make participant understanding more important than ever
As clinical trials accelerate, clear, accessible consent is essential to help participants understand, engage with and remain in a study.
Older trial participants reject bad design, not technology
Older trial participants aren’t rejecting digital technology — they’re rejecting poorly designed, inaccessible experiences that make participation harder.
5 key takeaways from the Patient Centricity and Engagement Conference
Key takeaways from the Patient Centricity and Engagement conference, exploring how trust, inclusion and meaningful partnership can help turn patient engagement from intention into action.
It’s time to stop calling adverse events ‘manageable’
A single word—manageable—can minimise the real burden of treatment side effects, and it’s time clinical trial communication reflected patients’ lived experience more clearly.
The value: why localisation pays off across global trials
Strong localisation reduces trial friction, supports site teams, improves participant understanding and helps global studies run more smoothly, fairly and efficiently.
The solution: Good localisation doesn’t feel translated
Learn what good localisation looks like in clinical trials and why participant-facing materials should feel naturally relevant, culturally appropriate and easy to understand across every market.
Healthcare information is becoming easier to access. Trust isn’t.
Sharing key insights from NEXT Pharma Summit on why trust, clarity and human-centred communication matter more than ever in healthcare.
It was never reluctance: What ASCO 2026 revealed about clinical trial recruitment
ASCO 2026 highlighted that low clinical trial recruitment is driven less by patient reluctance and more by gaps in awareness, communication, accessibility and patient education.
Where translation falls short in practice
Discover why translation alone is not enough in global clinical trials and how expert localisation improves participant understanding, trust and engagement.
Where it all began – why we developed The Experience Gap
Learn how The Experience Gap was developed to help sponsors, CROs and site teams improve clinical trial participation by identifying friction points, enhancing patient experience, and driving better recruitment and…